第7-9起对 DHS ICE 诉讼:麻省等18州、纽约州、U Oregon等20校

前情链接:
第1-3起诉讼 Harvard, California, JHU: 加州和 Johns Hopkins 也把 DHS 告了
第4-6起诉讼 Regents (UC), Z.W., Washington: 第4-6起对 DHS ICE 诉讼:加州大学、中国留学生等、华盛顿州

7月13日新增3起诉讼,目前累计9起诉讼。本帖用于追踪案件7-9。

7. Massachusetts v. DHS

位置:District of Massachusetts,上诉法庭1st Circuit
原告名单:

  • Commonwealth of Massachusetts
  • State of Colorado
  • State of Connecticut
  • State of Delaware
  • District of Columbia
  • State of Illinois
  • State of Maryland
  • State of Michigan
  • State of Minnesota
  • State of Nevada
  • State of New Jersey
  • State of New Mexico
  • State of Oregon
  • Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
  • State of Rhode Island
  • State of Vermont
  • Commonwealth of Virginia
  • State of Wisconsin

理由1:违反APA,Arbitrary And Capricious, Abuse of Discretion
理由2:违反APA,未经法定程序(Notice-And-Comment)
进度:13日起诉并申请Preliminary Injunction,案件分配给了Allison Burroughs法官,和Harvard案是同一个法官。已提交40份各高校、商会等支持Preliminary Injunction的证词。

8. State of New York v. DHS

位置:Southern District of New York,上诉法庭2nd Circuit
理由1:违反APA,Arbitrary And Capricious
理由2:违反APA,未经法定程序(Notice-And-Comment)
进度:13日起诉并申请Temporary Restraining Order, Preliminary Injunction, Stay。

9. University of Oregon v. DHS

位置:District of Oregon,上诉法庭9th Circuit
原告名单:

  • University of Oregon
  • Oregon State University
  • University of Southern California
  • Arizona State University
  • California Institute of Technology
  • Chapman University
  • Claremonet Mckenna College
  • Northern Arizona University
  • Pitzer College
  • Pomona College
  • Santa Clara College
  • Scripps College
  • Seattle University
  • Stanford University
  • Sant Mary’s College of California
  • University of Arizona
  • University of the Pacific
  • University of San Diego
  • University of San Francisco
  • University of Utah

理由1: 违反APA,Arbitrary And Capricious - 未经Reasoned Decisionmaking
理由2: 违反APA,Arbitrary And Capricious - Pretextual,并引用Trump“打开学校”的那条推作为证据
进度:13日起诉并申请Temporary Restraining Order、申请Summary Judgment、申请加急

1赞

7月26日更新

New York v. DHS

7月14日,被告告知法官政府已撤回7/6政策。

7月15日,法官将原告的TRO/PI/Stay申请denied as moot。

7月24日,原被告双方同意将案件审理暂停30天,双方在8月24日提交Status Report。原告认为目前无法确认7月14日宣布的撤回的实际实施情况。

U Oregon v. DHS

7月17日,双方提交Status Report,原告撤回Motion for TRO/PI、撤回Motion for Summary Judgment、撤回Motion to expedite or accelerate。但是原告认为仅仅从网站删掉7/6政策而不发通知会造成困惑,而且7月16日有一例学生以7/6政策为由被拒签F-1签证,所以双方将继续沟通并在7月27日再提交Status Report。