这一轮发钱与第一轮似乎对ITIN的处理不同

第一轮($1,200) 简单粗暴: 只要联合报税一方是ITIN,即使另一方有SSN也不能领,而且儿童也不能领。也就是说“一人ITIN,全家不能领”

When you file a tax return with a spouse that isn’t a citizen, that spouse doesn’t have a Social Security Number to put down. Instead, you typically enter an Individual Taxpayer Identification Number, or ITIN. If you used an ITIN, then anyone on that tax return was ineligible for a stimulus check – including your children. A family of five where both parents are citizens and they earn less than $150,000? They would receive the full $3,900. A family of five where one parent is a non-citizen and they earn less than $150,000? They would receive nothing.

来源:Forbes

更新:以下只是媒体的报道,还未得到条款原文的官方确认。
更新2:原文出来了(长达5500多页。。。),确认了以下内容。

(4) VALID IDENTIFICATION NUMBER.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—For purposes of this subsection, the term ‘valid identification number’ means a social security number (as such 2 term is defined in section 24(h)(7)).

(2) JOINT RETURNS.—In the case of a joint return, the $1,200 amount in subsection (a)(1) shall be treated as being—
(A) $600 if the valid identification number of only 1 spouse is included on the return of tax for the taxable year, and
(B) zero if the valid identification number of neither spouse is so included.

(3) QUALIFYING CHILD.—A qualifying child of a taxpayer shall not be taken into account under
subsection (a)(2) unless—
(A) the taxpayer includes the valid identification number of such taxpayer (or, in the case of a joint return, the valid identification number of at least 1 spouse) on the return of tax for the taxable year, and
(B) the valid identification number of such qualifying child is included on the return of tax for the taxable year.

来源:https://rules.house.gov/sites/democrats.rules.house.gov/files/BILLS-116HR133SA-RCP-116-68.pdf

也就是说,这一轮+ 修正上一轮:在收入和其他情况符合要求前提下,有SSN的成人和儿童两轮都可以领,而持ITIN的不行。
符合第二轮条件(有SSN)、但第一轮因为家庭成员ITIN原因没有领到钱的,似乎将会追加第一轮的款,因为第一轮的细则已经修正到跟这一轮一致(见 p.1999-2001)。

等出来原文再看看具体条款吧 媒体写的不一定完全准确

嗯,等着看条款原文

地主家也没余粮了。直接减半

1赞

其实不太明白为啥第一轮的时候要exclude ITIN的家庭?这里有什么缘由么

只有itin的既不是公民/绿卡也不(合法)工作,不给也情有可原吧

1赞

所以为什么有什么理由必须要给非公民呢?毕竟是国家税收呀

因为非公民也交税了

但第一轮的时候把整个一家人都exclude了

也就是说有SSN的NRA也计算在内了?

不理解为何要发钱。股市新高,和半年前完全不同。

因为从股市新高赚了钱发了财的和缺钱过不下去日子的根本不是一群人
发钱之后穷人多点钱过日子,不缺钱的多点钱扔进股票推新高,最后中国赢了。

6赞

现代版朱门酒肉臭?

股市如果是经济晴雨表,怎么会有那么多缺钱过不下日子的人呢?

美国股市未必是经济晴雨表吧

1赞

快进到推翻资本主义社会呀

第一轮就因为家属ssn拿晚了被排除了…打算明年再claim
现在第二轮又搞这花样,希望明年依旧能claim

今年美国GDP铁定负增长,股市却一直hit all time high,实体经济和股市早就脱钩了…

我和你情况一样,家属今年才拿ssn,特别怨念

股市从来就不是实体经济的晴雨表啊
股市是预期

利好茅台